Dear
Nicholson Baker,
I
love you. Don’t worry, this isn’t a fatal attraction. I am married with
children, married to an artist, in fact, and I know two writers would never
work, especially not one like me and one like you. You are my secret twin! Hmm,
probably I haven’t yet reassured you. As poetry and painting are sister arts, let me just say that I
am married to the perfect man. I am pretty sure you must be married to the
perfect woman, and I am glad we both have two children.
I
love you because 1) you are hilarious 2) all that good and silly stuff about
poetry in The Anthologist 3) all the good stuff about music and 4) your generous
acceptance of human foibles, and I love you in spite of the vague discomfort I
felt with what I like to call “the hifalutin’ porn” of The Fermata. (I haven’t
read Vox.) (I should have said p*#n instead of “porn.” Now I will get all kinds
of strange comments I’ll have to delete and mark as spam, and some new
followers who are just basically advertising their services by joining my
site. Sigh….) Soon I will get hold of
Double Fold, which people keep saying I will like, because I like books (and
paper), just as they said I would like The Anthologist. Those people were right.
While
reading The Anthologist, I laughed out loud many times, shaking any stress and/or
random toxins right out of my being. I attempted “eyelid wars,” and I tried to
cross my eyes with my eyes closed. I failed. (I tried this again in the waiting
room of the hospital and told my mom about it when, looking up from The Social
Animal by David Brooks, she suddenly asked me if I could say the alphabet
backwards. “No,” I said, pretty sure I
couldn’t. “Have you tried?” she asked. I tried, getting as far as “ZYX.” Then
my mother said the alphabet backwards, easily. You would like my mother. She loves
Sara Teasdale. This eyerolling backwards alphabet business happened during my
father’s pacemaker surgery. He’s fine. And I did not get lost in the
labyrinthine hospital halls this time.)
Back
to The Anthologist, and my reader response/love letter. While reading your
book, I tapped my foot and thrummed my
fingers to the beats in lines of poetry, which I also do while writing
poetry (even my unrhyming verse) or reading poetry. I cried many a silent “Yes!” to the ceiling
at the rest theory of meter and felt validated in my own rhythms. I went over to the
piano and played all your little melodies, eventually remembering that I had once
written lyrics for a Chopin prelude I played during my piano lesson years. In
another ceiling-ward glance of admiration, I wept
inside, released, and accepted life very deeply. Thank you for that.
And
tonight, you’ll be glad to know, I’m sure, dear Nicholson Baker, I am going to
see the movie Reaching for the Moon, about the poet Elizabeth Bishop and her
lover Lota de Macedo Soares, as I have always wanted to know more about the
particular losses in “One Art,” about “the art of losing.” (Many thanks to
Julie Kistler for the summaries and schedule posted here, in “Embracing Normal: LGBT Film Fest at the Normal Theater” in her fabulous blog, A Follow Spot. Yes,
we have a/an (?) LGBT Festival in good old Normal, Illinois! I wish I could
have seen I’m So Excited!, the Almodóvar film, last night, but at least I
watched the hilarious trailer.)
O,
Nicholson (what do they call you for short?), I saw you on Colbert and I hope you got the “Colbert bump” if that
is something that interests you. I will keep checking your books out of the
library and buy some whenever I can afford it. It comforts me that you are a
teensy bit older than me—you: Aquarius; me: Pisces (and I know this is
destroying my credibility and your reassurance that I am not a wacko, but hey,
it’s a Random Coinciday in the blog!)—but on the cusp. You are definitely wiser, in a nicely
foolish kind of way.
Thank you, thank you, a thousand ceiling-ward thanks…and I
know you understand these blueberries and Mirabelle plums.
Great post, Kathleen. Now I know how you feel about Baker, well, his book.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Maureen. I love to laugh, and to learn. This is like fiction and nonfiction in one!
ReplyDeleteThat was just such a grand novel, wasn't it! And the rueful voice it was written in, so generous and disarming.
ReplyDeleteYes, I loved that voice!
ReplyDeleteThank you. I will have to read backwards now from "Traveling Sprinkler" to "The Anthologist". I cannot say the alphabet backward, but it would be something monotonous I could practice aloud in the nap room to bore sleep-resistant kiddies into snores.
ReplyDeleteI know. I want to say it backwards now, too! I asked my mom if she could burp the alphabet. I shall not divulge the answer. I yearn for The Traveling Sprinkler now, as well. BUT The History of Love came in at the library, and that's next!
ReplyDeleteAlthough I shouldn't speak for the illustrious Mr. Baker, I'm pretty sure he would understand and approve of this. I think the only book of his that I've actually read is called U and I, and is basically an unrelenting fan letter to John Updike. A little hard to find now, but I think you'd like it.
ReplyDeleteI can imagine the unrelentingness of it and am already giggling.
ReplyDeleteI will look into this author. Thank you for this inside on where your mind goes while life happens around you as well. Nice beat to the whole piece.
ReplyDeleteHi Kathleen.
ReplyDeleteGlad to read that you are a fellow Pisces.
As part of my architecture degree I had to take a course in statistics. For the major assignment a friend and I analysed the birth dates of about a thousand well known architects to see if there was any clustering in a particular zodiac sign. The result was hugely statistically significant - most of them being Virgoans and Geminians. I have no idea why this should be so. Although Virgoans are said to be into details. Cancer came in third.
After graduating, the architectural firm I worked for had a staff which consisted almost entirely of Virgoans, The two partners were both Geminis, and there was a Cancerian guy too.
Coincidence?
I don't take astrology that seriously, but I tend to think there is more to it than the sceptics allow.
Thanks, Jeronimus! That statistical correspondence is amazing. Actually, I was making fun of myself re: astrology in the cliche of "What's your sign?" kind of way, but I think there is more to it, too. If the ancients observed patterns and alignments in people that paralleled alignments in the stars, etc., they were noticing SOMETHING going on, and it seems that we keep discovering and unfolding what that is--in many areas. Scientists keep re-discovering and confirming, via scientific method, and then refining, plenty of ancient knowledge, so I guess this may be like that someday. The part of astrology that has been reduced to entertainment encourages the skeptics to remain skeptical. The part of astrology that remains attached to ancient astronomy and is now also viewed through psychology is very interesting. All of it is part of the mystery that keeps me curious and alive with inquiry! And always making fun of myself, too. Since I know that I do not know! (tee hee)
ReplyDeleteReally enjoyed this, Kathleen!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Bethany!
ReplyDelete